Teaching Philosophy

It is my belief that the teaching of painting/drawing/art within the current cultural context
of the post-medium age is a complex process involving more than the teaching of the
traditional skills of painting.  The boundaries of the practice are completely open. Within
the flotsam and jetsam of competing metaphors, trends, and past traditions a solid
foothold or direction is hard to find. Though a multidimensional approach I encourage
and motivate students to build a complex, depthful and reflective relationship to the
questions they ask of themselves and their studio practice. It is my motto as well as e.e.
cumming’s that, “Always the more beautiful answer who asks a more beautiful question.”  
To aid in the asking of questions I assist my students in finding and increasing the skills
and understandings needed to develop their own unique relationships to the
materials/craft of painting, other mediums, the creative process, contemporary theory, and
the genealogy of painting.

For me the practice of contemporary painting is viable, exciting, and flexible. I bring this
same excitement and flexibility to the classroom. This flexibility is enacted on multiple
levels.  Philosophically I believe in multiple methodologies, especially ones that are
sometimes considered incompatible, such as the differing aesthetic positions of formalism,
mimeticism, and expressionism. It is in the synthesis of multiple approaches that one can
begin to understand that the art world is a complex weave of differing interpretations,
understandings, and motivations. My interest in exploring other disciplines such as gender,
literary, scientific, philosophical and psychological studies brings a broad base to the
classroom environment.  Through these engagements I hope my students gain a situated
knowledge of self as well as social expressions, attitudes and limitations. It is through
multiple perspectives and methodologies that I find supplementary and complementary
relationships, and this synthesized approach allows for a more open attitude. This
openness is mirrored in my relationship with my students, without which I would not be
able to recognize the different learning approaches, and unique qualities each student
possesses.   My goal is to connect with students on their various different levels and artistic
motivations, and to challenge them to learn how to learn in a variety of ways.

As a teacher, I believe strongly in the power of passion. The level of excitement,
engagement, and sense of wonder I bring to the classroom has the ability to overcome the
anticipated disconnects between teaching and learning approaches, and can overwhelm
boredom, fear, or disinterest in the classroom.   This passion fosters and yields inspired,
empowered, and well-educated students. This approach and the tone of my class lets
students know that I am accessible, and that we both have the common goal of success in
mind.  This balance builds a mutually constructed, safe environment for the rigors of the
classroom. I like to teach for same reason that I like to learn. I work toward increased
awareness for both my students and myself.  The excitement of teaching keeps me in
touch with my own learning experiences, and reminds me that there is always more to
learn.

Below are some examples of how I implement my teaching philosophy:

•    slide presentations addressing a wide variety of contemporary painting practices   
          including the use and visual influence of computers
•    the use of journals to increase the ability to reflect and build in roads to creative
          concerns
•    the use of journals to increase the ability to analyze, articulate, and understand the
          interrelationship of form, content, and context in contemporary paintings
•    encouraging student attendance of local and visiting guest speakers-artists, historians,
         theoreticians, performers etc.
•    complementing my teaching with the example of my own research and production
•    exposing students to art museums, galleries, performance spaces, and other relevant
         collections around campus and in the surrounding community
•    featuring a multicultural perspective that includes minority and underrepresented
         artists
•    multiple critique formats to keep the process fresh and developmentally varied
•    encouraging students to experiment and push beyond their initial captivations
•    class discussion of the machinations of creativity, semiotics, and the cultural
         production of meaning
•    valuing student and collegial feedback inside and outside the classroom in individual
         or small group discussions and meetings